When it comes to the discussion of economic development, the word “apartheid” simply doesn’t cut it. While I’m not a native English speaker, I’m quite familiar with the idea of the term. In my opinion, the word is very misleading. Rather, my thinking is that there are three levels of economic development. I’ll call the first two “special economic zones” and the latter “human geography.
Ill call the first special economic zone, and the third human geography. The term human geography is used in the United States to describe places like South Africa, where a person does not have to be a citizen to be entitled to a certain amount of money. However, the term is also used in the United States to describe places like Arizona, which is essentially the exact same thing for both citizens and non-citizens.
At the same time, the term is also used in the United States to describe places like South Africa, where citizens can’t vote, and a citizen is a person who isn’t a citizen. This is especially true in the United States where non-citizens are not allowed to vote in elections. This is because the United States is still a nation where the majority of its citizens are non-citizens.
I have always been fascinated by the idea of special economic zones, which are used to describe areas that are so different from ordinary places that they are considered “off the map”. These special economic zones are often called ‘ap’ because they are not included within the borders of states. So they are outside the boundaries of most states.
The idea behind these special economic zones is similar to the idea behind special military zones. They are areas of natural resources where people can earn money and be productive, but are not part of the state. In the U.S., if a person is born and raised in a state but wants to live somewhere else, they cannot be elected to office or even vote. Instead, they have to work for some kind of economic incentive, like being a doctor or teacher.
That’s not what I was talking about. I was referring to the idea that these zones could be created by private corporations to create jobs. In my mind, these are not economic zones at all. They are special economic zones. I don’t think the U.S. had the kind of wealth that a private company could create and sustain, but that’s just an analogy. The fact is, the U.S.
has become one of the world’s biggest economies. Even with the recession, it remains the fifth largest economy in the world. There are only a few countries that have more wealth than us, but that might only be because we are the richest country in the world.
In fact, these kinds of zones seem to be becoming the norm. The only countries with a higher average wealth is China, followed by Mexico. If you go to Africa, you find that most of the population is on these zones. So even though the U.S. is the richest country in the world, its not the only country in the world that has a lot of wealth.
You can think of these zones as special economic zones, which means that these zones are set up and controlled by wealthy companies. The more wealth a country has, the higher the premium on these zones, which is a good way to encourage more investment and economic growth.
So why is the state of Michigan set up like a special economic zone? Well because of a company called, “Michigan Strategic Fund.” Which is actually a special fund that’s open to investment, but only of companies that are headquartered in the state. In other words, any company headquartered in Michigan is allowed to invest in Michigan Strategic Funds. So if you are a company that is headquartered in Michigan and wants to invest in Michigan Strategic Fund, you can do so.
